Skip to content
Friday, October 9, 2026
Infonest

Tetris Wouldn't Win at The Game Awards — Another Award Type Might Solve This

Whenever a prominent awards ceremony draws close, you'll find an outcry for introducing fresh award types to recognize unsung work and satisfy the spirits of followers with niche passions.

Another commentator has already made for a horror game category. It would be amazing. So would board games, representing a dedicated supporter's campaign. But they will have to forgive me for pushing forward since similar to blinkered fanatics, I possess a compelling case supporting my request stands as crucial and significant. This is the request: It's essential to create a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works is not a science; it remains highly personal, and typically generate discussions resulting in unclear classifications. This explains why movie academies steer clear of genre categories. However, it represents an essential concession in the world of video games, that demonstrate such variety it's challenging to consider them as a single art form.

To recognize the complete range of gaming accomplishments to receive acknowledgment, while allowing diverse titles to have a chance for representation, genre categories are essential.

Existing Game Classification System

Leading game ceremonies currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Sim/Strategy, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these classifications effectively encompass many game types, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

This doesn't apply to logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to accommodate them. Think about these outstanding current releases, each quite distinct: building puzzles from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching from another release, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles of a third title. Where could they possibly go within current classifications? Unfortunately, nowhere.

The Representation Problem

There are dozens outstanding logic titles released every year lacking appropriate categories at major award shows, unless they happen to qualify for categories like Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, or the extremely competitive independent game categories.

  • A renowned logic title received no recognition completely that year
  • Another imaginative release was excluded that year
  • A beloved organization game received no acknowledgment that year
  • Only a few logic titles managed to sneak into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

These are often compact experiences, yet the craft of the puzzle game is of massive significance. Famous handheld logic titles stand as most popular titles globally maintaining this status for many years.

The famous puzzle experience challenges famous sandbox experiences claiming status as highest-selling title ever; it’s also in the running for best game of all time. Logic titles represent cornerstones for gaming as medium, and engaging with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Puzzle games wouldn’t have this problem. It would be easy to populate a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent numerous deserving experiences.

And to reiterate, these represent titles without proper classification in important events. Logic title developers are working at the challenging frontier interactive creation, producing among most fundamental forms of gaming itself. Similar to movie stunt professionals, they warrant appreciation. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.

The writer

Adam Banks

A seasoned content strategist passionate about digital storytelling and helping creators thrive in the online world.

Infonest

Type to search articles.